Of course, this made me think of my all-time favorite Tweet:
The E-cig shouldn't be confused with vaping, which has everyone across all political spectra running around with their dresses up over their heads. Vaping uses a small tank of liquid, and is essentially more like a small, handheld hookah than a cigarette; E-cigs or "cigalikes" look more typical cigarettes, have a tiny disposable cartridge or are entirely disposable, and more closely resemble cigarette smoking. Neither is good for you, but they have to be better than cigarettes.
Of course, the political class, following the lead of the health crowd, thinks you should not do any of this stuff. Don't stick anything in your lungs unless we tell you to! Such as that nice, soothing marijuana, which our state governments are generally slavering to legalize.
But this is the schizophrenic nature of modern society. When penalties for drunk driving were low, no liquor ads could be seen on TV. Now two DWIs are hard time and booze ads are everywhere. I'm not saying who's right, and it's never right to drink and drive (nor do I think people drive drunk more than they used to), but isn't there a sort of disconnect here?
Likewise with the vape thing. The CDC reports deaths and injuries attributed to vaping, but the news media seem to leave out the part that says:
Most patients report a history of using tetrahydrocannabinol (THC)-containing products. The latest national and state findings suggest products containing THC, particularly those obtained off the street or from other informal sources (e.g. friends, family members, illicit dealers), are linked to most of the cases and play a major role in the outbreak.
(emphasis and rolling eyes added)And suddenly any kind of vaping or e-smoking is a national crisis. So they all should be outlawed. (See above paragraph on pot, and note that 33 states and DC have legalized pot for fun and profit. Here in the Hudson Valley, farms formerly known for onions and sweet corn are growing weed like, well, weeds. But we should be frantic over E-cigarettes.)
All I can tell you is my friend is smoking fewer cigarettes thanks to her E-cig, which only contains one naughty ingredient (nicotine) that does not get you high or impair your ability to drive. If my friend goes over to only E-cig use, as planned, I know it will be easier for her to quit nicotine all together. Sounds like a social good to me.
But no, let's ban all the things! Except soma, of course.
3 comments:
Best wishes to your friend on quitting. I quit after ten years, going cold turkey. E-cigs and gum weren't available then - wish they had been. It was real tough for a couple of months.
There's a certain class of folks (usually on the port side of the ship) who want to ban for everyone else whatever they don't like, and make mandatory for everyone else whatever they do like. Unfortunately, these folks seem to predominate in government at every level. They cannot leave others alone.
Quitting cigarettes is easy, I must have quit hundreds of times ... before, like Mongo, going cold turkey in April 1981.
Many years ago, when I would occasionally indulge in the traditional, leafy form of THC, I soon learned that my wife has the ability to detect marijuana smoke residue at a level of about one part in 10 billion, so I gave that up as well. Happy wife, happy life.
Mongo, Woodstock, and Bear Johnson are right!
Post a Comment