Wednesday, March 31, 2021

Fred's Book Club: At the Plate.

It's Wednesday, friends, and that means another dose of the Humpback Writers, our Hump Day book feature. Get it? Hump Day, Humpback? No? Me neither. 

Anyway, it's also the day before baseball's Opening Day, and with that we have another baseball book, and another brief tale of Fred from when he had a career. Yes, today we have a book from National Geographic and the National Baseball Hall of Fame and Museum, a children's book that is as American as anything American can be. 

And I couldn't get to Ralph Kiner for an autograph. The local TV crews were all over him. 


America at Bat: Baseball Stuff & Stories came out of a national tour, and the tour came from the love for our nation in the wake of the dastardly attacks of September 11, 2001. The Hall of Fame and its partners decided to put together a tour of sensational baseball memorabilia from the museum, a tour that would launch with an appearance by dozens of Hall of Famers. It began in New York City in March 2002, and traveled as a museum installation for six years, finishing in Boston in September 2008. It was called Baseball As America. 



At the time of the launch I was working for a magazine in midtown, and was one of the only people on staff who was a fan of baseball, or any sport other than backbiting. So when the features editor got an invitation to the launch party at the American Museum of Natural History, she kindly asked if I wanted to go. Did I!


I could not have imagined being in a room with so many baseball superstars at once. Kiner was there, and Hank Aaron, and Warren Spahn, and Bob Feller, and 22 others, and somewhere I had a notebook and press info with everyone's names but that has been lost to time. 

Out of the tour came a commemorative book for adults, but I wasn't given a copy of that. I got the kids' book, written by Paul Rosenthal, with an introduction by Aaron, from which these pages come. It's a great little book, full of amazing baseball pictures, stories, trivia, and photos of objects from the Hall of Fame's museum that were on the tour. Tour items included a replica of Ruth's bat you could pick up, FDR's "green light" letter to Commissioner Landis recommending baseball continue during World War II, and of course ancient equipment, priceless uniforms and cards, and an Andy Warhol silkscreen of Tom Seaver


I thought then and think now that it was a nice thing for the Hall of Fame to do, and a reminder that sports could really bring people of all backgrounds together. 

Of course, in recent years, sports, like everything else, is being used to tear us apart instead. Which is why I can be sentimental about this sentimental book -- baseball was a light in a dark hour in New York City in the year after 9/11. I wish Major League Baseball and the other pro sports leagues felt that way now. Instead they seem to hate America as much as our foreign enemies do, and then wonder why Americans are tuning out. But I'll probably be watching some games this year, at least until the newly configured Mets fall prey to injuries and stupidity, as usual. 

Tuesday, March 30, 2021

The underpants scandal.

The latest victim of cancel culture is the great superhero Captain Underpants, or rather, Captain Underpants's co-creation by the same author and illustrator, Dav Pilkey. I'm not surprised at anyone being attacked by the woke mokes, but was confused about what happened in this case. The problem is supposed to be "passive racism" in a spinoff book. The New York Post reports:

The publisher announced it will no longer distribute Dav Pilkey’s 2010 graphic novel, The Adventures of Ook and Gluk: Kung-Fu Cavemen from the Future, saying in a statement released last week that the decision had been made with the “full support” of the author.

The author, of course, issued a groveling apology: “But this week it was brought to my attention that this book also contains harmful racial stereotypes and passively racist imagery. I wanted to take this opportunity to publicly apologize for this. It was and is wrong and harmful to my Asian readers, friends, and family, and to all Asian people.”


So what the hell was in this book?

The credited George Beard and Harold Hutchins are the child protagonists from the Captain Underpants books, and let's be very clear that they are not supposed to possess genius intellects. I've only seen a couple of illustrations from Ook and Gluk, and nothing seems too shocking -- just appropriately dumb for a book by a couple of little boys.

[sic] their village

I found it hard to believe that any were published in 2010. It's not like this guy was doing cartoons about the Japanese during World War II, like Dr. Seuss; this was eleven years ago. What's the issue? 

Amazon and Barnes & Noble have already pulled it, and Scholastic has told libraries to burn it. To the fire! You are not of the body! But my library system allows digital downloads, so I borrowed one quickly before they got the word -- and discovered Mr. Wong of the kung fu school, who teaches the heroes martial arts and saves the day. 


So Mr. Wong in the Mr. Miyagi part is bad, but geez, everyone looks goofy in this book. That's the point. It's a funny adventure as told by two knuckleheaded boys. But there's your passive racism. Meh, I call BS -- Mr. Wong is a hero of the story; all the bad people and stupid people are white. Who cares?

I wondered also if the depiction of kung fu, or the use of the term itself, was, as they say, "problematic." Merriam-Webster defines kung fu as "any of various Chinese martial arts and related disciplines that are practiced especially for self-defense, exercise, and spiritual growth," so perhaps the spiritual aspect that makes it turn up in a kids' gag book also made it offensive. I mean, I don't think this is the equivalent of Ook and Gluk traveling to the future, being ordained as Catholic priests, and then defeating the enemies of "there villege" by consecrating the bread and wine.  

Hard to believe, but it was almost ten years ago now that Simon Ledger was arrested on the Isle of Wight for singing the 1974 #1 Billboard Hot 100 hit "Kung Fu Fighting" by Carl Douglas. "A man of Chinese origin" who was strolling by the karaoke bar took offense, reported the offensive disco classic to the police, and Ledger was hauled out by the bobbies. Ultimately he was not charged, but the point was made. In response, the irrepressible Mark Steyn has been singing the song at appearances ever since. 

I guess we know who's next on the chopsocky block:

Could be!

Never mind that Phooey is a non-racially-aligned dog. And being voiced by a black performer and being the "Number One Super Guy" will not save Hong Kong Phooey's hash. So far he's safe, but that won't last long. 

I have to wonder who really got under Scholastic's skin about this Ook and Gluk book. Was it the Communist Chinese Party, which has been throwing its weight around all over the place, in matters grave and pesky? Was it a group of Asian children, more concerned about stupid books than attacks on Asians in cities or denial of college admittances to Asian students? Was it a genuine kung fu master, offended by the slight? Or was it a bunch of white women who make it their focus to be offended all day, every day, even by things that don't offend them?

If it's the last, they ought to be careful -- I hear a lot of them like yoga, which Merriam-Webster defines as "a Hindu theistic philosophy teaching the suppression of all activity of body, mind, and will in order that the self may realize its distinction from them and attain liberation". Their flippant abuse of this spiritual philosophy sounds pretty offensive to the Hindus, you ask me. I would hate for the perpetually outraged Karens and their yoga mats to be cast into the outer darkness like Ook and Gluk.

Monday, March 29, 2021

Feaster.

Every Thanksgiving, turkey becomes a huge deal -- every American has to comment on the turkey he or she is having for dinner, or explain why something else was on the menu. Eating kosher or halal is no excuse, of course, unless you're in some area that can't provide those butchers, but veganism, vegetarianism, poultry allergy, and just a strong dislike of turkey are acceptable excuses, although the excusee may harbor doubts about the excuser's devotion to the holiday and, by extension, America. The only non-turkey excuse that really works is the argument of authenticity, that the Pilgrims likely did not eat turkey on the first Thanksgiving, and thus one is instead having truly traditional dishes including eel and deer

Other holidays are not so steadfast on the entrée. Usually Easter boils down to ham or lamb, but it's a toss-up. A lot of people don't like lamb; they find it gamey, or they just don't want to eat young animals (these would avoid veal as well). The significance of lamb to the holiday is obvious, from Jesus the Lamb of God, but I'm not sure how ham got into the act. Unless it was to prove that, thanks to St. Paul, Christians can eat pigs and it's all cool. Sort of

You don't have to be Christian to love ham!

It may be that some families go with turkey for Easter, and I wouldn't be surprised. My preferred supermarket, the one on the five-story hill, has an offer that goes as follows: If you spend $400 in the store in the weeks leading up to Easter, you can use your loyalty card to get a free half shank smoked ham, store-brand turkey, frozen lasagna, kosher chicken, turkey breast, Tofurky, Gardein vegan "holiday roast," or deep discounts on other hams and turkeys. Going by this it looks like people eat ham, turkey, or spurious fake meat. But there are no lamb discounts. (I understand that people celebrating Passover would probably not be getting ham, and often will serve chicken, but where are the brisket discounts?)

Well, as for me and mine, we're having lamb shanks. What's on your menu? 

Sunday, March 28, 2021

Mulch ado.

My favorite supermarket was having a springtime mulch sale. What a coincidence -- I needed some mulch! And they had the red dyed stuff, my favorite! Why not buy what I need now, and avoid the hassle of going to a garden store?

Seems like a boring blog entry, doesn't it? Stay with me a second.

The good news is, the mulch was on skids right outside by the shopping carts. The bad news is, I still had to bring them inside to pay for them. And I needed nine bags, each containing 1.5 cubic feet and weighing about 30 pounds damp. 

A normal guy might take one bag in and ask for it to be rung up nine times, but as I am sure you know, Fred is no normal guy. No, I thought that might look dishonest. So I loaded three bags on the bottom rack of the cart, five in the basket, and one in the toddler seat. Then, mask in place, I bumbled into the store, humming a light tune like this was nothing weird, past the produce, past the florist, past the customer service desk, and into the checkout area. And I checked out. So far, so good.

But I should note that this supermarket sits high on a hill, and its parking lot is steep and progressively steeper the farther from the store one gets. So it was me, a (roughly) 60-pound cart, and 270 pounds of mulch starting a descent to where I'd foolishly parked a number of spaces away from the store itself. 

At first it was no problem, but as it got steeper the cart started to steer toward shiny new cars owned by others. All humming ceased. Seeing chaos about to ensue, I exchanged my grip on the handle and sidled alongside the side, using my body as a shield to keep the cart on a diagonal path toward my car. And luckily, I was able to make it there and move around to the front to make sure the cart did not go past my car, because from there is the road out of the lot and into the wilds of the world beyond. 



That's an extreme case, but the steepness of the lot can be challenging. This is especially true at the holidays, when people get big orders. I'm surprised that I haven't ever pulled in before Thanksgiving and seen a little ol' lady chasing a cart full of feast supplies down that hill. That damn turkey mayn't have flown in its life, but by damn, is it flyin' now!

Anyhow, mission accomplished, and now I don't have to go back to Home Depot for a while. Which is nice, because they leave the mulch sacks out in the rain and so they weigh more like fifty pounds each. Although their parking lot is flat.

Saturday, March 27, 2021

The Peep of doom?

Easter is nearly here -- tomorrow is Palm Sunday -- and so the Peeps are everywhere. Not that I have a problem with that. Longtime readers will know I've reviewed all sorts of Peeps products on this blog, even weird combo items like the Peeps Oreos

I would say that they have overrun the Easter aisle a little, but it's their main time of the year -- it would be like complaining that there are too many candy canes at Christmas. 

Look at this! Giant Peeps! Chocolate-dipped Peeps! Decorate-Your-Own Peeps! Hot cinnamon and birthday cake Peeps! Fruit punch and chocolate pudding Peeps! It's a Peep-for-all! 


And yet none of that makes me fear we have gone too close to the edge. But PEPSI x PEEPS? Is this a sign of the aPEEPcalypse? Oh, yes -- this may indeed be the last Peep.


From the press release: 

Fans can submit photos of themselves enjoying the spring with PEEPS® Marshmallow Chicks and Bunnies by tagging @PEPSI, #HangingWithMyPEEPS and #PepsiSweepstakes on Twitter and Instagram for the chance to win a coveted limited-edition three-pack of PEPSI x PEEPS®.

"After what has been a very difficult year, many consumers are looking for new things to smile about.  So, to celebrate the start of springtime, Pepsi collaborated with PEEPS® to develop a limited batch of its first-ever marshmallow cola.  This PEPSI x PEEPS® collaboration will be available in three bright colors through a distinctive mini-can design and will most certainly have fans buzzing all season long," said Todd Kaplan, VP Marketing – Pepsi. "We know our consumers love our limited product drops, and we believe that PEPSI x PEEPS® will deliver an iconic and delicious pairing that has the potential to become a fan favorite." 

Yes, you read that right -- Pepsi is putting out a marshmallow soda in conjunction with Peeps. 


Would I try this? Are you crazy? Of course I would try this! I would be letting the Internet down if I didn't post a review! But I'm a little confused as to whether this product is going to be available in stores or just through the sweeps-- uh, PEEPstakes. 

I'll let you know if I find it. A nice cold glass of marshmallow soda might be just what the doctor ordered, even if it is somehow another sign of the Armageddon. In which case, we will know that this Peeps soda was a fridge too far.

Friday, March 26, 2021

To Helen gone!

I'm not one to go tooting my own horn, as you know. I'd much rather bribe someone to toot my horn for me, and then act all embarrassed about the tootage. Oh, please, you make me blush!

Nevertheless, I wanted to put up a post today about Helen's Page, upon which I have signed for a trial basis.

Dr. Helen Smith, author of Men on Strike and, in her spare time, Mrs. Instapundit, has decided to take the cultural challenge of canceling to heart -- and fight back. Since prominent Internet platforms are deleting books and events and even persons that might get in the way of El Narrativo (in Mikeski's term), she has begun her own media page -- Helen's Page, "A Happy Place for Liberty-Minded People to Meet." 



So I created an account there. It's not much yet, mostly a means of displaying my novels and a link to come here, to this marvelous blog, whereupon one might click on those links to the right and peruse the wares. I'd like to support the page and help get people more interested in it, even if they don't want to buy my books.

We know that approximately half the known universe follows Instapundit, or should, so that's a lot of people who might check out Helen's Page. I hope more people join up, and we can make this bigger than Etsy, Craig's List, Angie's List, Huffington's Post, Drudge's Report, and Stiiv's Bunk! (Yeah, I know I got them wrong and one of them doesn't even exist. "Drudge Report" -- ha.)

Wish me luck, but mostly wish Dr. Helen luck -- this is her "Build Your Own Platform" moment, and with the other platforms becoming cancel culture mouthpieces for monothink, or being canceled themselves, we need more platforms "for Liberty-Minded People." 

There's a report on NBC that quotes a senior Department of Homeland Security official saying that "DHS plans to expand its relationships with companies that scour public data for intelligence" (you know which companies those might be). "'The idea is to identify people who may through their social media behavior be prone to influence by toxic messaging spread by foreign governments, terrorists and domestic extremists,' the official said. 'We want to Identify the narratives that are emerging, assess which narratives are likely to incite violence, figure out what targets are likely and then take steps to mitigate the risk.'" 

The ostensible cause for this plan is not the rioting last year that killed 25 people, injured hundreds, destroyed livelihoods and caused millions (if not billions) in damages; it's a handful of unarmed knuckleheads who got into the Capitol on January 6. The idea is that the government, which knew Ahmad Al Aliwi Alissa of Colorado was a problem and did nothing to stop him before he murdered ten innocents, is going to put people on a no-fly list (among other things) for Liking the wrong things on Facebook. I think it's safe to say that if this had been a Trump administration initiative, you'd have heard the screaming on cable news in the Kuiper Belt.

In other words, Helen’s Page is about more than getting some books in front of eyeballs. This is about creating space on the Internet for a free citizenry to enjoy basic freedom of political expression without fear of reprisal. We need a lot more of that. 

Thursday, March 25, 2021

Snowzimandius.

I met a traveller from a muddy place,

Who said—"One small and footless step of thin ice 

Rests in the yard. . . . Near it lies the face,

Of mud reversed from snow a visage lies, whose grimace,

And icy lip, and sneer of cold command,

Tell that its sculptor well those passions read

Which lasted, stamped once on a snowman's noggin,

The hand that crafted, on the snowman's head;

Within the mire, these words appear:

My name is Snowzymandias, King of Toboggan!;

Look on my Works, ye Frozen, and despair!

Nothing beside remains. Round the decay

Of that minuscule print, alone and bare

The lone and yellow grass stretch far away."



Wednesday, March 24, 2021

Fred's Book Club: Ante Up!

Greetings and salutations, and welcome back to our Humpback Writers feature, the Wednesday book feature that asks the musical question, "Why Humpback?" And gives the musical answer, "Because it falls on Hump Day and we thought it was funny at the time."

We've profiled every kind of book on this blog from blank marble notebooks to an encyclopedia, but I don't think we've covered an actual book of rules. Well, if you had that on your bingo card, mark it off!

According to Hoyle

If you're old enough you may recall people using the phrase "according to Hoyle," and not just in terms of card games. It was another way of saying "this is kosher" or "that's the way I heard it" or other expressions that denote correctness. So who was this Hoyle anyway, and who made him the boss of us?

Edmond Hoyle was a good card player in eighteenth-century London; good enough that he taught upper-class types how to play whist. He published the rules for the game and a treatise on the play, which sold out. Later he wrote books on other card games, backgammon, chess, and even probability theory, which shows he had a keen mathematical mind. Also, a keen marketing mind, since he fought off pirated versions of his books by making his name the one to look for. 

At this late date, the name Hoyle is like the name Webster, in that anyone can use it and it doesn't mean much. Those looking for authenticity in card games and dictionaries need to see editions of Hoyle's older books that have been written and updated in a line of his followers, like Apostolic Succession, and for Merriam-Webster, which company is the true descendent of Nathaniel Webster's. So is my little paperback, er, according to Hoyle?

I think so, or as close as I could get. The title page says it is "Based on the Foundations laid down by Edmond Hoyle," for what that's worth. The first printing of this edition goes back to 1946, which is not a surprise based on the illustrations. 

People in 1946 dressed better to travel by train
than we do now to be buried.

If you want an older version of the book, Mongo and our other friends at Gutenberg have Hoyle's Games Modernized by Professor Hoffmann and Edmond Hoyle, available for free here.

My little paperback is useful, if you want to have the rules handy. If you and your friends enjoy card games, it's best to have one source upon which you can agree. In 255 pages my book has rules for all kinds of card games, as well as chess, Scrabble, dominoes, and so on. They're all very terse and to the point; all forms of Bridge, rules and strategies, are spelled out in 33 pages, but from what I am told, Bridge is also spelled out in a lifetime of frustration and arguments.  

Now here's the story I wanted to tell about this paperback. 

When I was a young baby editor, in the days of buffering and no smartphones, my wife asked me to pick up a Hoyle book because she liked solitaire and playing card games with others. I occasionally had poker nights, so I could use the book too. There was a Barnes & Noble near my office, and the Friday morning of our company picnic, when no one wanted to do any work, I zipped down there and bought the book. It fit nicely in the pocket of my shorts. I figured I'd bring it home that night rather than leave it in the office until Monday.

Hours later, at the picnic, I sat down in the shade to see some of my coworkers playing cards on a bench. It turned out they were playing Hearts, a game I had played many times. Two of the guys (I'll call them Moe and Larry) were tied as the game progressed. Then on one deal, Larry wound up with what seemed like a disastrous hand, being stuck with all the hearts and the Queen of Spades (the black lady version of the game). Moe gloated, but I said, "He shot the moon." Larry smiled and nodded.

"What?" snapped Moe.

"He shot the moon. If you get all the hearts and the queen of spades, it's shooting the moon. He gets 26 points off his total."

"I NEVER HEARD OF THAT! THAT'S RIDICULOUS!"

"Well, I just happen to have Hoyle's book with me..."

I have never seen anyone's eyes bug out bigger than Moe's did as I put the book on the table. "WHO THE FUCK WALKS AROUND WITH HOYLE'S RULES IN HIS POCKET?"

Everyone else fell over laughing. 

The game pretty much came to an end after that. All I can say is, for all the books I've carried around with me all my life, that was the one memorable time when I happened to have exactly right book at the right time. Thank you, Mr. Hoyle!

Monday, March 22, 2021

Write on, brother.

Everybody writes sometimes, even if they only write lists or notes. The question is, how do you write? Do you use pen and pad, or do you dash of memos and things on tablets, smartphones, and computers?

YOU'RE DOING IT WRONG.

Okay, you're not doing it wrong, but one of the immutable rules of writing a blog is that you have to tell people that whatever they're doing, they're doing it wrong. ("10 Reasons Why You Eat Peas Wrong -- #8 Will Blow Your Mind!")

The reason I bring it up is an interesting study out of Japan about writing, published in the journal Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience. UPI reports:

Writing on paper, instead of on a tablet or smart phone, boosted the brain activity of a group of Japanese university students when they tried to recall information they'd learned an hour earlier....

"Actually, paper is more advanced and useful compared to electronic documents because paper contains more one-of-a-kind information for stronger memory recall," study co-author Kuniyoshi L. Sakai, a professor of neuroscience at the University of Tokyo, said in a press release.

In addition to aiding memory formation and recall, writing on paper is also more efficient. During the study, volunteers using paper completed their learning task 25 percent faster than the university students using tablets and smart phones....

"Digital tools have uniform scrolling up and down and standardized arrangement of text and picture size, like on a webpage," Sakai said.

"But if you remember a physical textbook printed on paper, you can close your eyes and visualize the photo one-third of the way down on the left-side page, as well as the notes you added in the bottom margin," Sakai said.

This makes sense to me -- there's a lot more tactile information registered in writing by hand, including the tool and pad used and where and when they're used. Seems to me that would indeed make a lot of unintended cues useful for retaining and retrieving the information.

I find that I prefer to make notes in longhand, but for lengthy writing I'll just use the computer. My wife, on the other hand, likes to write out first drafts in longhand on a legal pad, which helps her organize her thoughts, especially with complex jobs. So when I read the report on this study, I told her she was right about yet another thing in this life. 



The study itself was only limited to testing brain function and memory with memorizable tasks, not on the quality of the writing. It used "three groups of participants who read dialogues on personal schedules and wrote down the scheduled appointments on a calendar using a paper notebook (Note), an electronic tablet (Tablet), or a smartphone (Phone)". So this was not a test of whether one wrote better short stories or poems on paper or electronic device. 

It does appear that students are missing out, thanks to all the electronic devices available. Students have to deal with notes and memorization more than the average worker. 

I've been using a keyboard to write fiction since I was old enough to use a keyboard, but I have always started to work out plot outlines by pad. If you'd asked me why, I probably wouldn't have had an answer before. Now I think it may be that I sensed the pad made for a better means of juggling information on complex plots. In the kind of things I like to write, there's lots of bits of information that come up in one place and matter later, and to keep it all afloat I have to remember them as I go. Once the outline is set, I can write everything in a Word document, because now I don't have to remember everything.

How about you? Are you a pad person, an electronics person, or do you just trust your amazing eidetic memory to keep your data in your head?

Sunday, March 21, 2021

The stalking robot.

Pity the fool who tries to lose weight in these times of plentiful sugar and more plentiful anxiety! And now technology is working against us. 

My favored supermarket had a big renovation last year, as I noted at the time, which still has me bollixed up. I still can't remember where they've hidden the bread. I must admit, though, the place does look refreshed and more in keeping with modern design. 

But they've introduced a stalker. 


This little robot roams about the store freely, lurking around corners, humming down the aisles, toting his little rack of candy to entice shoppers to treat themselves to chocolaty goodness. 

What the hell is it?

Well, they call it Smiley, according to a story in Progressive Grocer. 

Smiley, true to its name, features catchy tunes and dancing as it makes its rounds through the store offering treats for sale. Smiley uses the latest in self-driving technology to ensure safe operation and includes sanitation wipes to safeguard shoppers. This pilot was enabled by Mars Wrigley’s Launchpad program, a digital innovation program established in 2017. Launchpad focuses on innovating the ways in which Mars Wrigley markets and sells its iconic brand through meaningful partnerships with startups.

I haven't noticed any catchy tunes, but I have not gotten that close to Smiley. He'll sidle up and stop for a while, but he doesn't run straight up to customers -- he's more of your soft-sell type robot. 

But he can't fool me. This is a candy-wielding Dalek.

“As a Treats & Snacks category leader, we know that while trips to stores are becoming more focused and retailers are moving to more seamless in-store shopping experiences, shoppers still want to be surprised or indulge in impulse purchases,” said Matt Tice, director of grocery category leadership at Mars Wrigley. “Introducing innovative solutions like Smiley will help retailers shake up traditional merchandising, improve their consumers’ shopping experience and drive sales.”

The short-term goal is to move more Snickers and make more money. The long-term goal? To exterminate through sugar! Diabetes, hypertension, heart disease, stroke -- Smiley is just a soft-sell killer robot! 

Next time I see him I'm going to interrogate him through his little touchscreen. What planet is he from? Mars? Hell, he's literally a creature from Mars -- Mars Wrigley! Here to kill us... with kindness! 

I'm going to get some answers. And one of those Snickers. Hey, you can't interrogate properly when you're hungry.

Friday, March 19, 2021

Horsin' around.

Was busy at the church last week, in the room where they keep a lot of rummage for rummage sales. Rummagepalooza. Anyone want some good rummage? I can hook you up. 

Sometimes I see pretty good toys, things that seem like winners and yet somehow did not get the ever-lovin' snot smushed out of them as a well-loved toy ought to. You never know with kids. You spend a hundred bucks on the toy and they want to play with the box. It's been that way since toys came in boxes.

Here's one I thought was pretty darn good:


I guess this toy proves that unicorns are no more than horses with horns on their heads, however much pink may occur on them naturally. That sound effect could have been around since the days when boys still played games with Western motifs. Now that's straight out, unless it's White Oppressors and Native Resistance. Which could be fun. However, I can imagine the neighing and galloping getting so annoying that a parent throws the thing out the back door, turning it momentarily into a Pegasus.

The point is, I never had a rocking horse to my knowledge, but if I had one like this when I was a toddler, I think I would have spent the day on it. Hi-ho, Pinkie Unicorn! 

Jerry Seinfeld talks about being bored to death as a child doing errands with his mother: "When you’re five and you get bored, you cannot support your body weight. I remember going to the bank with my parents... and I would lie down flat, like, 'Sorry, Mom, there’s nothing I can do. This place is so dull, I cannot get up.' This is what I think adulthood is: Adulthood is the ability to be totally bored and remain standing." But if he got a ride on one of those coin-operated horsies outside the store, he would be totally refreshed, ready to go look at carpet swatches.

If horsie's a-rockin', don't come a-knockin'!

Refreshment aside, the other problem with this toy for Baby Fred is that, of course, it's a girl toy. In my childhood in Bedrock, people still expected boys to play with boy toys and girls with girl toys -- guns and knives vs. baby dolls. As a toddler I think I would have just seen a horsie and gone for it. I could have gotten some opprobrium from the males in the family, yes. 

It's no better now, though -- it may even be worse. A modern male toddler riding on a pink unicorn rocker might make his progressive parents very proud, so proud they would start him on female hormones immediately and schedule his gender reassignment surgery. 

It's dangerous out there.

Anyway, it's not an issue for me at the moment. I'm way too big for this toy. I'm sure it will go to a good home, and I hope the little girl who gets it loves it. And if it's a little boy -- well, look out, kid.

Thursday, March 18, 2021

Genius idea!


 

Instapundit, under one of its "What could go wrong?" headers, linked to this article in MedicalXpress

Researchers discover deep sea microbes invisible to human immune pattern recognition

Okay, that's probably just fine, right? 

In the largest and deepest marine protected area in the world, a team of ocean experts peered over 3,000 meters below the surface to find new types of microbial organisms that people would have never encountered before. These microbes—types of bacteria—could now open up doors to new ways of understanding how the immune system responds to completely foreign invaders.

Well, that sounds great!

A collaborative study among the Rotjan Marine Ecology Lab at Boston University, the Kagan Lab at Harvard Medical School, Boston Children's Hospital, the government of Kiribati, and others has found that there are some bacteria so foreign to humans that our immune cells can't register that they exist, overriding the long-held belief of universal immunity, or that our cells can recognize any bacteria they interact with. Rather, the study found, some bacteria are solely defined by their local habitat or surroundings. Their findings were published Friday, March 12, in Science Immunology.

Emphasis added. As if to say "Oh."

"Our team discovered and cultured novel microbes that are completely immunosilent to human immune systems," says Randi Rotjan, meaning that the bacteria triggered no reaction or response from our innate immune system. Rotjan, a BU College of Arts & Sciences research assistant professor of biology and a co-lead author of the paper, says this discovery was completely unexpected.

All right, now I'm getting a little nervous. I mean, if there's no immune response, does it mean that the bacteria would have no effect on us? I don't think so....

More from Rotjan:

All bacteria cells have an outer coating. Lipopolysaccharide, or LPS, is the outermost layer of the bacterial membrane. This outermost layer is what allows other organisms to recognize it. LPS receptors of human cells, mice and horseshoe crab were unable to detect 80% of deep-sea bacteria examined. Now that we know this, there is a pressing need to learn more about host-microbe interactions in every ecosystem, as new discoveries may be made in each habitat. This opens up the potential for new biological tools and therapeutics. For example, using the silent bacteria as a way to deliver medicine or an immune therapy. A mechanistic understanding of our own immune system, coupled with an increased understanding of deep-sea life, opens up new avenues of science to simultaneously help human health while also providing important justification for increasing ocean protection. Interdisciplinary collaboration really opens up new worlds.

 Yes, no doubt in my mind that this bacterial discovery will be used for only therapeutic purposes. 

Rotjan also said:

Kiribati, where our team was based in 2017, is listed by the United Nations as a least developed country, and they have made an incredibly large ocean conservation commitment. One important aspect of this study is that it is a collaborative effort with the government of Kiribati, showcasing the importance and beauty of international partnerships.

Yes, we all love those international partnerships. Like those with the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China. You know, I heard that last year the National Institutes of Health was going to cut funding off from that institute, because there was some fuss about a coronavirus that got into the populace there. You may have seen something in the papers. 

Then, The Scientist reported, "77 Nobel laureates and 31 scientific societies separately sent letters to NIH Director Francis Collins criticizing the decision to terminate the grant and urging that it be reviewed." Apparently the outbreak in question did not come from the institute, but "most likely jumped from infected animals to humans" -- by enormous coincidence, right there in downtown Wuhan. Amazing! So of course the NIH backed down, because you elected officials can go pound sand; boffins know best.

Anyway, all this has made me wonder what international partnerships have been involved in the study of these non-recognizable bacteria. The "and others" in that top quoted paragraph is a little sly, isn't it? Well, I had a look at the abstract in Science Immunology and it doesn't all that international; all but two of the fifteen study authors listed are affiliated with American universities, the others from Poland and Kiribati. But where is the enormous funding for the project coming from? That we don't know.

However, if you're concerned that we're not getting enough foreign support for this mission, I think you shouldn't worry. The new administration is opening new doors to scientists in China, and various Nobel laureates and the NIH will be right there with them. I expect to find that the Shanghai Institute of Bacteriology is working on this invisible deep-sea bacteria before you know it. Of rather not to find; we won't know about it unless something bad happens.

That won't be the case. We can surely trust everyone involved, right? What could possibly go wrong? 

Wednesday, March 17, 2021

Fred's Book Club: Irish Humor, via Chicago.

Welcome back to the Wednesday book feature called the Humpback Writers for no reason we can determine. This year St. Patrick's Day falls on Hump Day, so we are behooved to profile an Irish-themed book for the day, albeit one from a native Chicagoan. And that brings us to Finley Peter Dunne, creator of the irrepressible Mr. Dooley and a Fred fave.

I was willing to spend a fortune on him.

During a hot spell in 2017 I profiled Dunne and his great teller of tales, Mr. Dooley. Dooley is a classic example of a lower class character of long standing, that being a comical retailer of truths who is wiser than the smart set who would look down on him. Dunne, writing at the turn of the last century, chose an Irish gentleman to be his avatar. Other examples might include Joel Chandler Harris's Uncle Remus, Mike Royko's Slats Grobnik, and basically Will Rogers's entire career. 

My 1963 paperback, which may have passed through many hands until it came into mine, contains essays on such topics as the youthful President Teddy Roosevelt, the benefits of hanging aldermen, international affairs, and women's suffrage. The hardest part of reading Dunne's work is to know what the issues of the time were; the second hardest is to get in the rhythm of the Irish dialect as portrayed on paper. If you know a little American history and have been able to get through Mark Twain, you'll be all right with Mr. Dooley. 

I can find no better way to celebrate St. Patrick's Day literarily than presenting one of the essays from the book -- which can also be found in the collection of Dunne's work on Project Gutenberg, thanks to friend Mongo and those other fine preservers of literature in this age of book-burning. In a time when the police are indicted and violent felons turned loose, I thought it would be good to hear from Mr. Dooley...

ON CRIMINALS.

"Lord bless my sowl," said Mr. Dooley, "childher is a gr-reat risponsibility,—agr-reat risponsibility. Whin I think iv it, I praise th' saints I niver was married, though I had opporchunities enough whin I was a young man; an' even now I have to wear me hat low whin I go down be Cologne Sthreet on account iv th' Widow Grogan. Jawn, that woman'll take me dead or alive. I wake up in a col' chill in th' middle iv th' night, dhreamin' iv her havin' me in her clutches.

"But that's not here or there, avick. I was r-readin' in th' pa-apers iv a lad be th' name iv Scanlan bein' sint down th' short r-road f'r near a lifetime; an' I minded th' first time I iver see him,—a bit iv a curly-haired boy that played tag around me place, an' 'd sing 'Blest Saint Joseph' with a smile on his face like an angel's. Who'll tell what makes wan man a thief an' another man a saint? I dinnaw. This here boy's father wur-rked fr'm morn till night in th' mills, was at early mass Sundah mornin' befure th' alkalis lit th' candles, an' niver knowed a month whin he failed his jooty. An' his mother was a sweet-faced little woman, though fr'm th' County Kerry, that nursed th' sick an' waked th' dead, an' niver had a hard thought in her simple mind f'r anny iv Gawd's creatures. Poor sowl, she's dead now. May she rest in peace!

"He didn't git th' shtreak fr'm his father or fr'm his mother. His brothers an' sisters was as fine a lot as iver lived. But this la-ad Petey Scanlan growed up fr'm bein' a curly-haired angel f'r to be th' toughest villyun in th' r-road. What was it at all, at all? Sometimes I think they'se poison in th' life iv a big city. Th' flowers won't grow here no more thin they wud in a tannery, an' th' bur-rds have no song; an' th' childher iv dacint men an' women come up hard in th' mouth an' with their hands raised again their kind.

"Th' la-ad was th' scoorge iv th' polis. He was as quick as a cat an' as fierce as a tiger, an' I well raymimber him havin' laid out big Kelly that used to thravel this post,—'Whistlin'' Kelly that kep' us awake with imitations iv a mockin' bur-rd,—I well raymimber him scuttlin' up th' alley with a score iv polismin laborin' afther him, thryin' f'r a shot at him as he wint around th' bar-rns or undher th' thrucks. He slep' in th' coal-sheds afther that until th' poor ol' man cud square it with th' loot. But, whin he come out, ye cud see how his face had hardened an' his ways changed. He was as silent as an animal, with a sideways manner that watched ivrything. Right here in this place I seen him stand f'r a quarther iv an' hour, not seemin' to hear a dhrunk man abusin' him, an' thin lep out like a snake. We had to pry him loose.

"Th' ol' folks done th' best they cud with him. They hauled him out iv station an' jail an' bridewell. Wanst in a long while they'd dhrag him off to church with his head down: that was always afther he'd been sloughed up f'r wan thing or another. Between times th' polis give him his own side iv th' sthreet, an' on'y took him whin his back was tur-rned. Thin he'd go in the wagon with a mountain iv thim on top iv him, sway in' an' swearin' an' sthrikin' each other in their hurry to put him to sleep with their clubs.

"I mind well th' time he was first took to be settled f'r good. I heerd a noise in th' ya-ard, an' thin he come through th' place with his face dead gray an' his lips just a turn grayer. 'Where ar-re ye goin', Petey?' says I. 'I was jus' takin' a short cut home,' he says. In three minyits th' r-road was full iv polismin. They'd been a robbery down in Halsted Sthreet. A man that had a grocery sthore was stuck up, an' whin he fought was clubbed near to death; an' they'd r-run Scanlan through th' alleys to his father's house. That was as far as they'd go. They was enough iv thim to've kicked down th' little cottage with their heavy boots, but they knew he was standin' behind th' dure with th' big gun in his hand; an', though they was manny a good lad there, they was none that cared f'r that short odds.

"They talked an' palavered outside, an' telephoned th' chief iv polis, an' more pathrol wagons come up. Some was f'r settin' fire to th' buildin', but no wan moved ahead. Thin th' fr-ront dure opened, an' who shud come out but th' little mother. She was thin an' pale, an' she had her apron in her hands, pluckin' at it. 'Gintlemin,' she says, 'what is it ye want iv me?' she says. 'Liftinant Cassidy,' she says, ''tis sthrange f'r ye that I've knowed so long to make scandal iv me before me neighbors,' she says. 'Mrs. Scanlan,' says he, 'we want th' boy. I'm sorry, ma'am, but he's mixed up in a bad scrape, an' we must have him,' he says. She made a curtsy to thim, an' wint indures. 'Twas less than a minyit before she come out, clingin' to th' la-ad's ar-rm. 'He'll go,' she says. 'Thanks be, though he's wild, they'se no crime on his head. Is there, dear?' 'No,' says he, like th' game kid he is. Wan iv th' polismin stharted to take hold iv him, but th' la-ad pushed him back; an' he wint to th' wagon on his mother's ar-rm."

"And was he really innocent?" Mr. McKenna asked.

"No," said Mr. Dooley. "But she niver knowed it. Th' ol' man come home an' found her: she was settin' in a big chair with her apron in her hands an th' picture iv th' la-ad in her lap."

Tuesday, March 16, 2021

The buzz on the fuzz.

Greetings, friends! Reader Mark dropped a line the other day asking about the beard project that I had announced back on January 9, to wit: As a lockdown protest, and something less troublesome than a tattoo or a mid-life sports car, I was going to grow a beard. So, what happened to it? 

Then I realized there were some other topics broached during the year to date that deserved follow-up, so here's a run-down on the works. 

BEARD

So yes, about the beard. Well, if this winter feels like it's been as long for you as it does for me, you might imagine that my beard has become like that of the legendary Charlemagne, whose beard was not only silvery and long but was said to have continued to grow after his death until it filled the sarcophagus and eked through the joins. 


But I stand before you today barefaced. With an explanation.

Shortly after I began the Facial Fungus Project, my wife announced we had been invited over to friends' for dinner a couple of weeks hence. I had to promise that if I still looked like a grubby prospector at that time that I would remove the growth to preserve a neat appearance. And alas, I looked worse than Humphrey Bogart in the last reel of The Treasure of the Sierra Madre, and thus the beard had to go. My spirit broken, I have not returned to the project since. 

DOG

Friends have been asking me how we've coped in the last month since we lost junior varsity dog Nipper. And indeed we are still sad. But people have also been asking how senior varsity dog Tralfaz is getting on without his little buddy, and that's more complicated. 

Fazzy was never really close to Nipper; Nipper always wanted to jump and play, and Fazzy is more your laid-back observer-of-the-scene type. So they never really bonded the way we had hoped. 

The strange thing is that I expected we'd fall into our old pre-Nipper patterns from four and a half years ago, but for a big guy like the Fazz, that's half a lifetime. New patterns were set. Tralfaz was perfectly happy to let Nipper take the lead on playtime, snacktime, and general attention-demanding time. I wouldn't ever call him a sidekick -- he's way too independent -- but he liked having the little guy take the initiative. So he's been a bit confused as to how to act. Consequently, when he does want something, it's all whine, all the time. Drives us nuts. 

But he's still a sweetheart, and we love him. We're all just a little confused. 

DIET

I would like to say my attempt to cut down on unhealthy food is going along fine, but you see, I suffer from hand, food, and mouth disease. My hand shoves food in my mouth, and my mouth eats it. 

If I weren't wearing sweats all the time here in New York, Lockdown Land USA, I would have a better grip on my progress. Sweats are too forgiving. They tell you everything is fine; have the cheesecake. Khakis and jeans are less so. Work denim has little mercy. Dress pants will give you one warning, then the pants will rip on the day of your presentation. 

I think I've made progress, but as I reported a few days back, since the loss of Nipper my Fitbit thinks I died. Nips always wanted walks, but Fazzy is less interested. So the exercise level is down.

There are my excuses explanations. What's new with you?

Monday, March 15, 2021

Chuckles.

We've been a little grim here on the ol' bloggeroo lately, going on about cancel culture and the malfeasance of the public health profession. Let's lighten it up with some jokes today. 

In fact, today I'm glancing at what the Bulletin of Bibliography called a "splendid collection of jokes and humor sayings," which is Toaster's Handbook by Peggy Edmund and Harold Workman Williams (H.W. Wilson Co., 1914). Actually I'm looking at the 1916 edition, thanks to Mongo and our other friends at Project Gutenberg, who have made the whole thing available online. "Jokes, Stories, and Quotations" says the subtitle. I thought we'd have a look.


We know it's easy to poke fun at humor of an older time, or to get all mad at it for making fun of things we wouldn't make fun of now. Back then ethnic and regional jokes were very big, but jokes about religion and sex were kept to men's saloons and would not be found in a book like this.

We've tried to be more sensitive and less rude about ethnic humor since 1916, and most regional jokes have lost their buzz. But since the VCR brought R-rated movies into the house we've lost the ability to tell jokes and anecdotes without #&^$!* language. Comedians have been using effenheimers to liven up lame jokes for decades, but that wasn't an option a century ago. 

There are more than enough lame jokes, like this:

Charlie and Nancy had quarreled. After their supper Mother tried to re-establish friendly relations. She told them of the Bible verse, "Let not the sun go down upon your wrath."
     "Now, Charlie," she pleaded, "are you going to let the sun go down on your wrath?"
     Charlie squirmed a little. Then:
     "Well, how can I stop it?"

And jokes that time has left behind, like this:

"My ancestors came over in the 'Mayflower.'"
"That's nothing; my father descended from an aëroplane."—Life.

Therefore, my self-imposed challenge is to find ten jokes in this book that made me laugh out loud or at least smile, jokes that don't insult any modern sensibilities. (There certainly are some doozies that I found offensive, even shocking, and I am no snowflake.) A lot of topics are evergreen, like money, the battle of the sexes, gossips, and golf, and the book arranges its jokes by subject matter. I'm not sure that makes my task easier. And I'll warn you that I'm leaving the Irish jokes in. 

Will I find ten funny jokes? Let's find out! If it helps you enjoy them, just drop in some F-bombs as you read, as if told by a modern jokester.


1) "Shine yer boots, sir?"
    "No," snapped the man.
    "Shine 'em so's yer can see yer face in 'em?" urged the bootblack.
    "No, I tell you!"
    "Coward," hissed the bootblack.

2) A good Samaritan, passing an apartment house in the small hours of the morning, noticed a man leaning limply against the doorway.
    "What's the matter?" he asked, "Drunk?"
    "Yep."
    "Do you live in this house?"
    "Yep."
    "Do you want me to help you upstairs?"
    "Yep."
    With much difficulty he half dragged, half carried the drooping figure up the stairway to the second floor.
    "What floor do you live on?" he asked. "Is this it?"
    "Yep."
    Rather than face an irate wife who might, perhaps, take him for a companion more at fault than her spouse, he opened the first door he came to and pushed the limp figure in.
    The good Samaritan groped his way downstairs again. As he was passing through the vestibule he was able to make out the dim outlines of another man, apparently in worse condition than the first one.
    "What's the matter?" he asked. "Are you drunk, too?"
    "Yep," was the feeble reply.
    "Do you live in this house, too?"
    "Yep."
    "Shall I help you upstairs?"
    "Yep."
    The good Samaritan pushed, pulled, and carried him to the second floor, where this man also said he lived. He opened the same door and pushed him in.
    As he reached the front door he discerned the shadow of a third man, evidently worse off than either of the other two. He was about to approach him when the object of his solicitude lurched out into the street and threw himself into the arms of a passing policeman.
    "For Heaven's sake, off'cer," he gasped, "protect me from that man. He's done nothin' all night long but carry me upstairs 'n throw me down th' elevator shaf."

3) Fun is like life insurance, th' older you git th' more it costs.—Abe Martin.

4) On a voyage across the ocean an Irishman died and was about to be buried at sea. His friend Mike was the chief mourner at the burial service, at the conclusion of which those in charge wrapped the body in canvas preparatory to dropping it overboard. It is customary to place heavy shot with a body to insure its immediate sinking, but in this instance, nothing else being available, a large lump of coal was substituted. Mike's cup of sorrow overflowed his eyes, and he tearfully exclaimed,
      "Oh, Pat, I knew you'd never get to heaven, but, begorry, I didn't think you'd have to furnish your own fuel."

5) There is a lad in Boston, the son of a well-known writer of history, who has evidently profited by such observations as he may have overheard his father utter touching certain phases of British empire-building. At any rate the boy showed a shrewd notion of the opinion not infrequently expressed in regard to the righteousness of "British occupation." It was he who handed in the following essay on the making of a British colony:
     "Africa is a British colony. I will tell you how England does it. First she gets a missionary; when the missionary has found a specially beautiful and fertile tract of country, he gets all his people round him and says: 'Let us pray,' and when all the eyes are shut, up goes the British flag."

6) SUNDAY SCHOOL TEACHER—"Willie, do you know what becomes of boys who use bad language when they're playing marbles?"
     WILLIE—"Yes, miss. They grow up and play golf."

7) The fact that corporal punishment is discouraged in the public schools of Chicago is what led Bobby's teacher to address this note to the boy's mother:

DEAR MADAM:—I regret very much to have to tell you that your son, Robert, idles away his time, is disobedient, quarrelsome, and disturbs the pupils who are trying to study their lessons. He needs a good whipping and I strongly recommend that you give him one.
Yours truly,      
Miss Blank.

To this Bobby's mother responded as follows:

Dear Miss Blanks—Lick him yourself. I ain't mad at him.
Yours truly,      
Mrs. Dash.

8) "Don't you think the coal-mines ought to be controlled by the government?" 
       "I might if I didn't know who controlled the government."—Life.

9) An express on the Long Island Railroad was tearing away at a wild and awe-inspiring rate of six miles an hour, when all of a sudden it stopped altogether. Most of the passengers did not notice the difference; but one of them happened to be somewhat anxious to reach his destination before old age claimed him for its own. He put his head through the window to find that the cause of the stop was a cow on the track. After a while they continued the journey for half an hour or so, and then—another stop.
    "What's wrong now?" asked the impatient passenger of the conductor.
    "A cow on the track."
    "But I thought you drove it off."
     "So we did," said the conductor, "but we caught up with it again."

10) Newspapers always excite curiosity. No one ever lays one down without a feeling of disappointment.—Charles Lamb.

So there you have it, ten jokes that I thought were pretty good that would make a room laugh if the teller had some talent in telling them. Not all would be acceptable for modern audiences, though -- number 4 would only be if told by an Irishman (and it would be) and number 5 is poisoned by the very idea of colonialism, unredeemed by the sneaky Brits being the butt of the joke. Oh, well -- life's funny that way. But riders on the LIRR will vouch to this day for number 9.

I know P.L. Woodstock, one of our correspondents on this blog, is a walking joke machine, so I trust he'll have some thoughts on the matter. But please feel free to weigh in with your own jokes, razzes, or whatever in comments. 

Sunday, March 14, 2021

Sprang ahead.

Pardon me, but I'm writing as if I'm under the influence of some substance. It is all about lack of sleep, though. 

Friday night we had wind gusts of up to 50 mph. Large dog Tralfaz is not afraid of thunder or fireworks, but strong winds freak him out. I stayed downstairs with him overnight to comfort him. That worked brilliantly. I slept about four and a half hours, not in a row. He was whimpering, whining, and wanted to go out a number of times. 

What made it worse was I had a meeting to attend Saturday morning at eight, and three projects for work in the afternoon. And on top of it all, I lost an hour of sleep Saturday night due to Springing Ahead for daylight savings time. I hate springing ahead.


When I was a young man about town, I could go on low sleep for a few days in a row with no major problems. Of course, some of the symptoms of sleep deprivation, like memory issues and trouble with thinking and concentration, were me as I was in college anyway, so the difference would have been hard to notice. Now it actually matters. 

So forgive me for being brief today, but I'm trying to avoid using my laptop as a pillow. 

When will we end the daylight savings time menace? I can't do anything about the wind, and I can't use narcotics on the dog, but there's no reason we should still be dealing with this spring ahead/fall behind nonsense. It's a relic from an earlier time, and I say it's spinach and the hell with it. 

Saturday, March 13, 2021

Medical update: Duh.


There was a headline in Medscape on March 11 that made me want to reach in through the Internet and do some serious Moe slappin': 


Well. How about that. I wonder if what they thought they knew was wrong is what the rest of us have come to know they were wrong about. Let's have a look at some quotes from the piece. 

[Michael Osterholm, PhD, director of the Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy (CIDRAP) at the University of Minnesota] says mixed messages may have cost the US in terms of public support.

"I think it is a really unfortunate situation because we burned a lot of bridges in terms of people wanting to follow or support public health measures," Osterholm says.

Oh, do you think so? 

In a scientific brief published in March 2020, the WHO cautioned that there was no evidence that the virus was lingering in air and making people sick, though recent experiments suggested that it might be doing just that.

Scientists who study aerosols were dumbfounded.

In a strongly worded letter to the journal Science, Kimberly Prather, PhD, a professor and atmospheric chemist at Scripps Institution of Oceanography, sought to clear the fog. "There is overwhelming evidence that inhalation…represents a major transmission route for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)" she wrote.

According to this piece, the World Health Organization made an awful lot of errors. Totally innocent, of course. I wonder if anyone had an idea that the WHO could not be trusted? I seem to recall one fellow, orange complexion, kind of loud... but everyone says he was talking through his hat. Also. China comes in for no blame in this piece, despite its well-known lies and coverups about the whole thing, abetted by its flunkies at the WHO. So where does the blame lie? Well, there's an optimistic quote from a certain White House figure that's framed to make it look like he is a moron:

The same day the WHO declared a pandemic, then-President Donald Trump addressed the nation from the Oval Office. "The virus will not have a chance against us," he said, "No nation is more prepared or more resilient than the United States."

Today, of course, the US leads the world in COVID-19 cases and deaths.

ISWYDT. 

We shall see in this article that our public medical friends only made innocent mistakes out of unfortunate ignorance and the interference of politicians. And aren't they oh so trusting in those Chinese death figures? 


But let's go on.

Much of the public health guidance given to the public last year turned out to be incorrect.

"Putting aside rampant disinformation and political interference, the real tragedy was not having any COVID-19 testing for the first 2 months of the US pandemic, which promoted diffuse spread of the virus across the country, and we've never been able to contain it since," said Eric Topol, MD, professor of molecular medicine at Scripps Research and editor-in-chief of Medscape.

"That was the unforgivable mistake…a fatal mistake for thousands of Americans," Topol said.

I seem to recall there was COVID-19 testing available, although its failure to be widespread had more to do with the "this is just the flu, don't worry" out of these public health poohbahs than any "political interference." It's nice to blame someone else, isn't it, especially for your "unforgiveable mistake"?

Notice that the "rampant disinformation" isn't pegged to anyone. We're left to think it came from the White House rather than a certain nation that starts with a C and ends with an A and isn't Cambodia. You know, the one that was locking up doctors?

Of course, it wasn't all bad.  The development of the vaccines, which happened with unprecedented speed, was a dazzling achievement.

"It's astounding, you know, and it's a testament to the scientific community, the medical community, the regulatory community, the pharmaceutical industry, you know the fact that everybody was able to do this," on such an accelerated timeline and without compromising safety, "was a very happy surprise," Heise says.

Now everyone is hoping we can get them rolled out in time.

Didn't that orange guy whom everyone hates have some role to play in getting the vaccines out before year's end, when everyone was saying it was impossible? Sounds vaguely familiar....

"I think it's just a reminder that we have to be very humble when we deal with these viruses. We have, have, to be humble," said Osterholm.

Some experts worry we will pay a price for these missteps now.

As he has watched the new coronavirus variants emerge, he says he's realized we're in a whole new ballgame with COVID now.

"I always give people a disclosure when I talk about these viruses now, that you know, I know less about them now than I probably did 6 months ago. And I think that type of open mind is what's going to help get us through here and envision what the future might look like and what we have to plan for," Osterholm said.

Oh, don't worry about it at all. We know everything from now on will be really, truly on the level. Even though you all told us that it was okay to go out and parade around for social justice when you wouldn't let people leave their apartments, and even though public health officials in states like mine signed off on sending sick people to nursing homes, we know you're all about duty and humanity. 


Sure, we the public will trust you. Just as much as you trust us.